Thursday, April 4, 2013

Avoid impulsive acts by imagining future benefits

Apr. 3, 2013 ? Why is it so hard for some people to resist the least little temptation, while others seem to possess incredible patience, passing up immediate gratification for a greater long-term good?

The answer, suggests a new brain imaging study from Washington University in St. Louis, lies in how effective people are at feeling good right now about all the future benefits that may come from passing up a smaller immediate reward. Researchers found that activity in two regions of the brain distinguished impulsive and patient people.

?Activity in one part of the brain, the anterior prefrontal cortex , seems to show whether you?re getting pleasure from thinking about the future reward you are about to receive,? explains study co-author Todd Braver, PhD, professor of psychology in Arts & Sciences. ?People can relate to this idea that when you know something good is coming, just that waiting can feel pleasurable.?

The study, which was published in the first issue of the Journal of Neuroscience this year, was designed to examine what happens in the brain as people wait for a reward, especially whether people characterized as ?impulsive? would show different brain responses than those considered ?patient.?

The lead author of the study was Koji Jimura, then a postdoctoral researcher in Braver?s Cognitive Control and Psychopathology Laboratory, and now a research associate professor at the Tokyo Institute of Technology, in Japan.

Unlike previous research on delayed gratification that had people choose between hypothetical rewards of money over long delays (e.g, $500 now or $1,000 a year from now), this Washington University study presented their participants with real rewards of squirts of juice that they chose to receive either immediately or after a delay of up to a minute.

?It?s kind of funny because we treated the people in our study like researchers that work with animals do, and we actually squirted juice into their mouths,? Braver says.

Results show that a brain region called the ventral striatum (VS) ramped up its activity in impulsive people as they got closer and closer to receiving their delayed reward. The VS activity of patient people, on the other hand, stayed more constant.

The researchers interpreted these different brain responses to mean that impulsive people initially did not find the prospect of waiting for a reward very appealing. However, as they approached the time they?d receive that reward, they became more excited and their VS reflected that excitement.

?This gradual increase may reflect impatience or excessive anticipation of the upcoming reward in impulsive individuals,? says Jimura. This was unlike patient people, who were likely content with waiting for the reward from the start, as no changes in VS activity were observed for them.

The most novel finding of the study concerned the anterior prefrontal cortex (aPFC). This is the part of the brain that helps you think about the future. Here, we found that the patient people heightened activity in the aPFC when they first started waiting for they reward, which then decreased as the time to receive the reward approached. Impulsive people didn?t show this brain activity pattern.

?The aPFC appears to allow you to create a mental simulation of the future. It helps you consider what it?ll be like getting the future reward. In this way, you can get access to the utility and satisfaction in the present,? says Braver.

By thinking about the future reward, patient people were able to gain what economists call ?anticipatory utility.? While their reward was far away in time, they were giddy with anticipation in the present. Conversely, impulsive people weren?t thinking beyond the present and so did not feel pleasure when they were told they had to wait. Their excitement built only as they got closer to receiving their reward.

Overall this study suggests that people may be impulsive because they do not or cannot imagine the future, so they prefer rewards right away. This research could be useful for assessing the effects of clinical treatments for impulsivity problems, which can lead to issues such as problem gambling and substance abuse disorders. A similar brain imaging approach as was used in the Washington University study could allow clinicians to track the effects of an intervention on changes not only in impulsive behavior but also changes in patients? brain responses.

?One possible treatment approach could be to enhance mental functions in aPFC, a brain region well-known to be associated with cognitive control,? says Jimura. By increasing cognitive control, impulsive patients could learn to reject their immediate impulses.

Impulsivity occurs not only in a clinical setting but also every day in our own lives. Applying his research to his personal life, Braver says, ?When I?m successful at achieving long-term goals it?s from explicitly trying to activate that goal and imagining each decision as helping me achieve it, to keep me on track.? Perhaps adopting this strategy of focusing on the long-term could help us move past present distractions and move toward our future goals.

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:


Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by Washington University in St. Louis. The original article was written by Melanie Bauer.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Journal Reference:

  1. K. Jimura, M. S. Chushak, T. S. Braver. Impulsivity and Self-Control during Intertemporal Decision Making Linked to the Neural Dynamics of Reward Value Representation. Journal of Neuroscience, 2013; 33 (1): 344 DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0919-12.2013

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/top_news/top_health/~3/pS3TfVvi2hs/130403200020.htm

soul train

Wednesday, April 3, 2013

How much is a nuclear program worth? For Iran, well over $100 billion.

After a half century of work, the benefits of Iran?s nuclear program remain few: It provides less than 2 percent of Iran?s energy needs and some medical isotopes and has demonstrated scientific prowess.

But the costs of the nuclear project have also been enormous: More than $100 billion in lost oil revenue and foreign investment alone, according to a report released today by two Washington think tanks.

?Sanctions have raised the cost of Iran?s nuclear pursuit. Yes, they are proceeding with their [program], but the cost is going up,? says Alireza Nader, an Iran analyst at the RAND Corporation in Washington, a security think tank not involved with the study.

The high cost of Iran?s nuclear effort ? which continues to grow, even under a US-engineered global sanctions regime ? have raised questions for years about Iran?s ultimate intent. Is it to show, as Iran?s top officials claim, that the ?revolutionary? Islamic Republic can defy sanctions, and Western and Israeli hostility, proving itself a ?model? of independence for other Islamic and developing countries?

Or is the only explanation for such dogged persistence that Iran is determined to achieve nuclear weapons capacity ? if not a weapon itself ? regardless of the cost and despite its own public rejection of nuclear weapons as un-Islamic?

?Iran?s nuclear program has deep roots. It cannot be ?ended? or ?bombed away',? ? making diplomacy the ?only long-term solution? to ensure it remains peaceful, conclude report authors Ali Vaez for the Federation of American Scientists, and Karim Sadjadpour of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington.

RECOMMENDED: How much do you know about Iran? Take our quiz to find out.

Iran has been ?overplaying" the nationalist aspects of its nuclear ambitions, rendering ?any significant nuclear retreat tantamount to an act of capitulation, if not political suicide,? the report says.

Meanwhile, ?Washington?s overwhelming focus on coercion and military threats has backed US policymakers into a rhetorical corner," it asserts.

In public and in ongoing nuclear talks, Washington must answer some key questions in order to persuade Iran and its public to consider a deal, says the report: ?What could Iranians collectively gain by a nuclear compromise, other than a reduction of sanctions and the threat of war? How could a more conciliatory Iranian approach improve the country?s economy and advance its technological ? including nuclear ? prowess??

DETERRENCE

The report is the first to tabulate the cost of Iran?s nuclear program, and therefore gauge its significance for the Islamic regime.

?It?s reasonable to argue that sanctions and pressures and diplomacy, positive and negative inducements ? if you don?t want to call them ?carrots and sticks? ? have a bearing on Iran?s calculations, because it?s not North Korea,? says Mr. Nader, whose recent work examines Iran?s motivations for continuing such a high-cost path.

?It gets lost in this town as to why they are pursuing this [nuclear] capability. It?s not to nuke Israel; they don?t want to nuke the US or Saudi Arabia, which makes zero sense,? says Nader. ?It?s deterrence, and you don?t hear US officials talk about their deterrent needs.?

The concerns of negotiators of the P5+1 group (the US, Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany) echo those of decades ago, when in the 1970s Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi was a close ally and had carte blanche US military and diplomatic support.

Back then, Iran?s nuclear program saw a 12-fold increase in the number of nuclear scientists in just three years, the report notes, and the same questions were raised about Iran?s intentions: issues of sensitive technology, fuel stockpiles, and more safeguards to prevent any push for a bomb.

After the 1979 Islamic revolution, Iran?s nuclear effort was put on ice for years, dismissed by the new government as a costly hindrance imposed by the West, and finally buried when Iran?s revolutionary leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini said the unfinished power reactor at Bushehr should be used as ?silos to store wheat,? according to the report.

Still, after Iran?s nuclear program was resurrected in the mid-1980s, it absorbed Iranian assets. By one count, building the uranium enrichment facility at Natanz beneath 25 feet of concrete at one point consumed Iran?s entire concrete output.

MORE TO THE STORY

While the report notes that it is ?nearly impossible? to calculate the actual costs of Iran?s nuclear program, it gives examples of how some of Iran?s efforts do not make sense in a traditional cost-benefit analysis.

Iran has limited quantities of its own natural uranium, for example, such that even under the ?most optimistic variants? it would only have enough known supplies to fuel its sole reactor at Bushehr for nine years. If ?total known and speculative resources? are counted, at most Iran could run seven reactors for less than a decade, according to the report.

And, by some estimates, relying on nuclear fuel enriched domestically could cost Iran $125 million more per year than buying fuel on the international market.

According to the report, Bushehr today provides just 2 percent of Iran?s electricity needs ? and 15 percent of the electricity that courses through the national grid ?is lost through old and ill-maintained transmission lines.?

Separately, the report adds, Iran?s solar energy potential may be 13 times higher than the country?s ?total energy needs.?

?I ask myself the question: Why is the regime in its entirety ready to pay such a high price, and make such great sacrifices, if there is no military component?? asks Ali Alfoneh, an Iran specialist at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies in Washington.

TOO FAR ALONG TO GIVE IN

In the 1970s, France, assisted by the US and others, helped Iran develop nuclear technology that might have led eventually to an Iranian bomb. The prospect did not raise alarms like it would today.

?The Shah?s regime had a responsible foreign and security policy, and ? was not perceived as a threat, despite the fact it was militarily superior to many of the neighbors,? says Mr. Alfoneh. But the Islamic Republic ?has managed in the course of the last 34 years to be perceived as the greatest threat in the region, because of the policy of exporting the revolution, the rhetoric of Iranian leaders, [and] irresponsible measures," he says.

The big investment made by Iran already means it is not likely to be negotiated away, says Mr. Vaez ? who is now with the International Crisis Group ? and Mr. Sadjadpour, in their report.

?Many members of the US Congress will continue to demand that Iran be left with ?no capability? to produce nuclear weapons,? including halting all enrichment, the report states.

But this is ?not essential from a nonproliferation standpoint? to limit Iran?s program, it continues. ?More importantly, there is virtually no chance that Iran will abdicate what it and many developing countries now insist is a right ? a right to enrichment.?

RECOMMENDED: How much do you know about Iran? Take our quiz to find out.

Related stories

Read this story at csmonitor.com

Become a part of the Monitor community

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/much-nuclear-program-worth-iran-well-over-100-171221923.html

joba chamberlain new york mega millions jetblue jetblue michelle malkin october baby sugarland

Who Really Wants A Facebook Phone? - Business Insider

Social Media Insights is a daily newsletter from Business Insider that collects and delivers the top social media news first thing every morning. You can sign up to receive Social Media Insights here or at the bottom of this post.


Who Really Wants A Facebook Phone? (TechnoBuffalo)
Getting one's head around the "Facebook phone" hype is a struggle. Let?s start with HTC. While it got off to a great start with the HTC One, it still can?t compete with the likes of Apple or Samsung. And so it needs to get creative about its approach. Next are the Facebook fans who are legion. So any new mobile-driven initiative by the social network will start with a huge built-in user base. But all of the major platforms and devices already have the service, and some are pretty well integrated with it.?It all boils down to is this: Do today?s smartphone users really want a bona fide Facebook phone? Read >>

A Facebook Phone: The Final Brick In The Walled Garden? (GigaOM)
A "Facebook phone" is one of the longest-running rumors in the technology world, but a number of observers think such a beast is actually going to make an appearance next week. But do users actually want one??At the moment, Facebook has a somewhat fragmented approach to the phone: there is the main Facebook app, but there?s also the Instagram app ? which the social network acquired for close to $1 billion because it saw the photo-sharing community as a clear and present danger ? and the standalone Facebook messenger app, and its Poke app. The company seems to be trying to find as many entry points for users as possible to engage with the network, and a phone with more integration could help. Read >>

Mobile Messaging Apps May Be A Threat To Facebook (Reuters)
Create personal profiles. Build networks of friends. Share photos, videos and music. That might sound precisely like Facebook, but hundreds of millions of tech-savvy young people have instead turned to a wave of smartphone-based messaging apps that are now sweeping across North America, Asia and Europe.?Many of those who are using the new messaging apps remain on Facebook, indicating there is little immediate sign of the giant social media company losing its lock on the market. But the firms that can take over the messaging world should be able to make some big inroads, investors say.? Read >>

Softbank-Backed Startup SmarTots Builds Facebook For Kids (Bloomberg)
A former Nokia engineer is building a private social network in China where children share art projects online with parents or grandparents. Japan?s phone and Internet giant Softbank is betting he?ll succeed. SmarTots, Jesper Lodahl?s Beijing-based startup, began offering mobile education applications for kids from two to seven through Apple?s China iTunes store in June. Designed as a game center for app developers, this month it?s adding functions to allow parents to "like" or comment on projects in a layout similar to Facebook. Softbank, which provided funding, and Lodahl, expect growth in smartphones and tablets to drive demand for educational services. Read >>

What Are The Three S's Of Social Media? (Skyword via DR4Ward)
According to content management company Skyword, the three S's of social media are:

  1. Searchable: Captures the passion and pain points of the consumer
  2. Snackable: For the on-the-go consumer
  3. Sharable: Serves as the root of discussions across social media

For a successful content strategy, it might be worth a try. Click here for the full infograph. Read >>

Consumers Tell Brands To Speak Only When Spoken To (J.D. Power via Forbes)
It?s every CMO?s worst nightmare: a social media crisis that has taken on a life of its own and is posing a real threat to a brand?s reputation. To develop rapid response capabilities, companies are shifting emphasis to technologies and platforms that make listening more important than messaging. a recent survey from J.D. Power points to the risks associated with monitoring: 51 percent of consumers simply do not want companies to eavesdrop on their conversations and 43 percent believe that monitoring is an intrusion on their privacy. The majority of consumers, 64 percent, insist that they want companies to respond to social comments only when spoken to. Read >>

How Social Media Can Cause Social Change (The Huffington Post)
You have no doubt seen the Human Rights Campaign's new red and pink equal sign avatar that is sweeping through Facebook this week as well as pictures and status updates affirming support for same-sex marriage. But what does it all mean? Why does it matter? Social media can be petty and frivolous; it can be a drain on time and fuel jealousy. But, when it comes to politics, social media serves as a powerful echo-chamber that can shape views on candidates and issues alike. In this sense, it is not much different from conversations with friends, family and co-workers around the dinner table or the office water cooler. When a Facebook user sees his or her news feed is filled with pronouncements of support for same-sex marriage, that may lead to several outcomes. Read >>

Here Are The Social Media Complainers (Facebookeeping)
People live in fear of the complainers, people who arrive on their social media channels to complain or have a good rant. We shouldn't fear them however, these are mostly customers who can teach us about our business and particularly what we don't do well. Here are the different sort of complainers you may encounter and how you can deal with them.? Read >>

Source: http://www.businessinsider.com/who-really-wants-a-facebook-phone-2013-4

mlb dodgers phillies phillies yankees bryce harper cory monteith

Tuesday, April 2, 2013

Timbaland Accused Of Insurance Scam Over $1.8 Million Missing ...

NEWS

Timbaland is seeking a payout over a $1.8 million watch that allegedly went missing, but the company behind the expensive jewelry doesn't believe his story. The super producer is being accused of committing insurance fraud to get a check.

Not that he needs the money, since his net worth is estimated at $75 million, but conflicting stories has the insurance company suspicious.

From TMZ:

TMZ broke the story ... Timbaland filed a lawsuit against American Home Assurance Company claiming his 2-year-old daughter lost his Jacob & Co. watch bedazzled with 30 carats of diamonds ... and the insurance company won't ante up.

But in new legal docs ... A.H.A.C. claims it doesn't owe Timbaland a dime -- claiming he's been as slippery as a seal, lying like a rug. The insurance company claims:

-- Timbaland bought the watch for $900,000 but insured it for TWICE the purchase price.

-- Timbaland reported the watch stolen ... but 4 months later claimed his daughter misplaced it.

-- Everyone involved told a different story ... the wife implicated another female, the assistant implicated the maid, the maid only copped to sleeping with Timbaland's brother-in-law and the brother-in-law refused to cooperate. No one ever mentioned the daughter losing the watch, like Timbaland belatedly claimed.

The missing watch came during a hectic time for the Virginia native. His family believed that he was going to attempt suicide because he was upset over losing the watch. In August of 2010, the father of two went out for a drive and couldn't be reached by family members. He was eventually found by police, and taken back to his home.

Days later he confirmed that he was distraught over the stolen watch, but had no intentions of taking his life.

--

Photo: ?AP

MORE ON HIP-HOP WIRED!

??Michael "Blue" Williams' "Guns For Greatness" Buyback Event Snags 115 Firearms [PHOTOS]

??Kevin Ware Already Walking On Crutches After Gruesome Leg Break [PHOTOS]

??The Game Helps La La Anthony Lose Weight & Tips His Waiter $6000 [PHOTOS]

??Barack Obama Attends Syracuse vs. Marquette Elite 8 Game [PHOTOS]

??No Chill: 10 Things Drake Was Doing While Chris Brown Was Writing His Rap Diss [PHOTOS]

??Lil Twist Throws Party In Justin Bieber's Mansion While Singer Is Out Of Town [PHOTOS]

' + '' + '' + google_ads[0].line1 + '' + '' + '' + '' + google_ads[0].visible_url + '' + '' + '' + google_ads[0].line2 + '?' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { s += 'Ads by Google' for(i = 0; i Ads by Google ' + google_ads[i].line1 + ' ' + google_ads[i].visible_url + ' ' + google_ads[i].line2 + '?' + google_ads[i].line3 + '
'; } } if (google_ads[0].bidtype == "CPC") { /* insert this snippet for each ad call */ google_adnum = google_adnum + google_ads.length; } document.write(s); return; } google_ad_client = 'ca-pub-1940594850564020'; /* substitute your client_id (pub-#) */ google_ad_channel = '3249262363'; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_ad_type = 'text'; //google_image_size = '728x90'; google_targeting = "content"; google_feedback = 'on'; google_skip = google_adnum; /* to skip for multiple units, insert this snippet for each ad call */ // -->

Source: http://hiphopwired.com/2013/03/31/timbaland-accused-of-insurance-scam-over-1-8-million-missing-watch/

hillary clinton

PBS shows how hacking is reclaiming its good name after a bad rap (video)

PBS explains how hacking got a bad rap and is reclaiming its good name video

Hacking is still a loaded concept for many, often conjuring negative images of corporate espionage, fraudsters and prank-minded script kiddies. PBS' Off Book wants to remind us that hacking wasn't always seen this way -- and, thanks to modern developments, is mending its reputation. Its latest episode shows that hacking began simply as a desire to advance devices and software beyond their original roles, but was co-opted by a sometimes misunderstanding press that associated the word only with malicious intrusions. Today, hacking has regained more of its original meaning: hackathons, a resurgence of DIY culture and digital protests prove that hacks can improve our gadgets, our security and even our political landscape. We still have a long way to go before we completely escape movie stereotypes, but the mini-documentary may offer food for thought the next time you're installing a custom ROM or building your own VR helmet.

Filed under: , , ,

Comments

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2013/03/31/pbs-explains-how-hacking-is-reclaiming-its-good-name/

danica patrick Michelle Laxalt Alabama Shakes PlayStation 4 michael jordan Safe Haven Robbie Rogers